CVHdr
 

Arrestor Gear

Similar to what I have done for catapults I have also tried to collect information on Post WWII aircraft carrier arrestor gear.  From this data I have tried to develop some trendlines and "rules of thumb" to assist in assessing the total weight impact of such systems on a ship's design, so that I can both try to adjust the raw weight data for the ships and designs that I have information on as well as to allow a designer to make an assessmt of the weight impact of trying to fit such equipment onto a new design.  Looking at the data in Ref CV1 and other sources it appears that a common arrestor gear configuration would be to include one arrestor gear engine per pendant/arrestor wire with an additional engine available as a spare and/or for the barricade system. 

Information & Trendline Data

In general arrestor gear fall into SWBS group 586 Aircraft Recovery Support Systems.  However, there will also likely be some weights impacted by the installation of such systems in other SWBS groups including foundations (SWBS 185), operating fluids (SWBS 588) plus spares parts and special tools (SWBS 589). 

Based on information from general internet searches and the like I have been able to put together the following information;

Arrestor Gear Energy Base Wt w100+ w500+ Pullout Length (ft) LZ width
(ft-lb) (LT) (LT) (LT) Barricade Wire (ft)
US Mk7 Mod2  38,373,000 * 37.0 3.3 37.7 388 349 120
US Mk7 Mod3/4  47,500,000 43.0 3.9 43.7 409.5 349 120
US Mk14



394 300 120
UK Mk13  19,600,000


150 220 100
UK DA2  30,000,000



265 100


Where Energy represents the Recovery Energy that the arresting gear can accomodate in foot-lb, which was either specifically listed for some gear or which was estimated by calculation based on the stated recovery weight and speed of various aircraft that the gear was listed as being able to support  Based on this data I plotted Weight versus Recovery Energy as shown below.

ArGr1

Although this data is limited to only two points right now, it represents the best information that I have been able to currently review and it can hopefully be used to develop weight estimates for the other catapults listed in the table above and/or to provide a designer with a means of estimating the weights of other similar systems.

As with the catapults, it is also necessary to include a couple additional weigth items in order to get a better overall estimate of the total potential weight impact that the installation of such systems may have on a ship.  Here I have used some basice rules of thumb for some of these weights as folows;

SWBS 185 - Structural Foundations - 8.84% of SWBS 586
SWBS 599 - Spares and Special Tools - 0.15% or so of SWBS 586

In addition, looking at Ref CVX for the US Mk7 mod3 Arrestor Gear it appears that each arrestor engine includes about an additional 1.6% its weight in hydraulic fluids (125 gallons of hydraulic oil @ about 7.2lb/gal).

Using the above data I have revised the table above as shown below to allow a user to investigate alternate arrestor gear installations.

Arrestor Gear Energy Base Wt w100+ w500+ Pullout Length (ft) LZ width
(ft-lb) (LT) (LT) (LT) Barricade Wire (ft)
US Mk7 Mod2  38,373,000 37.0 3.3 37.7 388 349 120
US Mk7 Mod3/4  47,500,000 43.0 3.9 43.7 409.5 349 120
US Mk14



394 300 120
UK Mk13  19,600,000 24.7 2.2 25.1 150 220 100
UK DA2  30,000,000 31.5 2.8 32.0 181 265 100
   
Est Based off Estimated Max Energy
Est Based off Similar System

In addition typical wire spacing for the arrestor gear appears to be 40ft on US ships or 26ft on UK (1950 & 60 era) designs.

This document maintained by PFJN@mnvdet.com.